Read-Only Forum Archive
PetPitcher Forum

PetPitcher Forum (https://forum.petpitcher.net/index.php)
-   Plant Competition - July 2009 (https://forum.petpitcher.net/forumdisplay.php?f=217)
-   -   Drosera Entry - July 2009 (https://forum.petpitcher.net/showthread.php?t=2620)

David 5th July 2009 11:51 AM
Drosera Entry - July 2009
 
3 Attachment(s)
Entry 09 - D. capensis "typical"

Attachment 1785

Attachment 1786

Attachment 1787

David 6th July 2009 03:23 PM
Re: Drosera Entries - July 2009
 
3 Attachment(s)
Entry 11 - D. mannii

Attachment 1797

Attachment 1798

Attachment 1799

David 8th July 2009 01:39 PM
Re: Drosera Entries - July 2009
 
3 Attachment(s)
Entry 20 - D. graomogolensis

Attachment 1824

Attachment 1825

Attachment 1826

David 10th July 2009 03:44 PM
Re: Drosera Entries - July 2009
 
3 Attachment(s)
Entry 26 - D. ordensis

Attachment 1846

Attachment 1847

Attachment 1848

David 13th July 2009 12:08 PM
Re: Drosera Entries - July 2009
 
3 Attachment(s)
Entry 41 - D. Lake Badger Up

Attachment 1890

Attachment 1891

Attachment 1892

David 13th July 2009 12:25 PM
Re: Drosera Entries - July 2009
 
3 Attachment(s)
Entry 44 - D. capilaris

Attachment 1899

Attachment 1900

Attachment 1901

David 13th July 2009 12:36 PM
Re: Drosera Entries - July 2009
 
3 Attachment(s)
Entry 46 - D. intermedia

Attachment 1905

Attachment 1906

Attachment 1907

David 13th July 2009 01:01 PM
Re: Drosera Entries - July 2009
 
3 Attachment(s)
Entry 47 - D. intermedia

Attachment 1917

Attachment 1918

Attachment 1919

David 13th July 2009 03:37 PM
Re: Drosera Entries - July 2009
 
3 Attachment(s)
Entry 55 - D. nitudula ssp allanostigma x occidenatalis ssp occidenatalis

Attachment 1938

Attachment 1939

Attachment 1940

David 13th July 2009 03:43 PM
Re: Drosera Entries - July 2009
 
3 Attachment(s)
Entry 56 - D. nitidula x pulchella

Attachment 1941

Attachment 1942

Attachment 1943

David 14th July 2009 10:30 AM
Re: Drosera Entries - July 2009
 
3 Attachment(s)
Entry 68 - D. Lake Badgerup

Attachment 1977

Attachment 1978

Attachment 1979

David 20th July 2009 11:16 AM
Judges Comments and Votes for Drosera Category
 
Entry 9 – D. capensis

Quote:
A vigorous plant, but it looks like it has been grown in very low light.

Entry 11 – D. mannii

Quote:
Very pretty, and appears well-grown.
- 2 votes


Entry 20 – D. graomogolensis

Quote:
A healthy looking plant. The mix is covered in algae, which looks unattractive. This is not always easy to get rid of, but it’s worth trying for exhibitions.

Entry 26 – D. ordensis

Quote:
Nice plant, but the D. burmannii in the pot should be removed!
Quote:
Really well grown specimen of not the easiest complex of Drosera to grow. Love the colouration of the laminas at the end of the wooly petioles. Stronger sunlight would encourage even brighter leaf colouration, but all in all, a very well grown plant.


- 2 votes


Entry 41 – D. Lake Badger Up

Quote:
Nice plant, but the pot and mix are quite ugly. Presentation is important for these kinds of competitions.

Entry 44 – D. capillaris

Quote:
Lovely plant, but once again, it is too low in the pot.

Entry 46 – D. intermedia

Quote:
A nicely grown plant – it would be a little better if it was cenered in the pot and there were no other plants in the pot.
- 1 vote


Entry 47 – D. intermedia

Quote:
A nice set of plants, well grown and in flower.
Quote:
Really nice plant - love the way the grower has grown this species as a dense colony completely filling the pot. Plants are clearly very well grown by the abundance of healthy leaves and numbers of inflorescences that have been produced. Exposure to stronger sunlight would encourage the leaves to become more intense red. Try growing this pot with zero shading and the result will be breathtaking! Very well done!
- 2 votes


Entry 55 – D. nitidula hybrid

Quote:
Nice little plant. These pygmy species look best when they are grown in a sandy mix that fills the pot

Entry 56 – D. nitidula x pulchella

Quote:
The pot is ugly and it contains 2 species. The plants of interest are nicely grown, though.
Quote:
Beautiful, well coloured specimens of an excellent pygmyy cross. Like how the grower has replicated natural conditions and used large grit / small pebbles - and N. nitidula and N. pulchella often grow in this type of substrate naturally. Love the established clumps forming as the colony has multiplied and grown together. very nice plants.


- 1 vote


Entry 68 – D. Lake Badgerup

Quote:
Once again, the plants look quite nice, but the presentation is not so good. A sandy mix that fills the pot is required to make these drosera look good.

David 20th July 2009 10:43 PM
Member's Poll for Drosera Competition
 
Each member is allowed one vote. So vote for the best entry. Each member's vote represents 1 point. Poll will be close on Sunday, 26 July 2009.

David 24th July 2009 05:33 PM
Re: Member's Poll for Drosera Competition
 
Entry 47 = 2 members votes + 2 judges votes = 12 points

Entry 56 = 2 members votes + 1 judges vote = 7 points

Enrty 11 = 2 members votes + 2 judges votes = 12 points

Entry 46 = 2 members votes + 1 judges vote = 12 points

Entry 26 = 3 members votes + 2 judges votes = 13 points

Entry 20 = 1 members vote = 1 point

Entry 68 = 1 member vote = 1 point
(one member vote has been cancelled as the member has >5 post on the forum and is not eligiable to vote in the competition)


WINNERS OF THE DROSERA COMPETITION

Certificate of Cultural Excellence
Entry 26 D. ordensis from Ifurita

Certificate of Cultural Merit
Entry 47 D. intermedia from picesilim


All times are GMT +9. The time now is 12:15 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Site by David Tan, Founder and Administrator of petpitcher.net and forum.petpitcher.net